Immortal: a detailed analysis (my response)

By Gene Doucette | January 25, 2011 |

My response

Last week, I linked to the blog of author Jacqueline Lichtenberg who wrote a detailed an interesting critique of Immortal.  I actually originally read her entry back in November, when she first penned it, and she gave me the opportunity at that time to write a “guest blog” as a response to her commentary.  I did, and it posts today.

You will find it here.  As before, please comment.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Liked it? Take a second to support Gene Doucette on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Posted in Immortal, Reviews and tagged , ,

No Comments

  1. Annikka Woods on January 25, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    Hey Gene.

    I posted my response. I think i wrote a novel again. *sigh* I need to quit talking so much. But really, that review of hers, and her comments after, irritated me.

    Reply
  2. genedoucette on January 25, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    Nicely done!

    Reply
  3. WotV on January 26, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    My two cents (I don’t have much spare change at the moment) have been added.

    Reply
  4. dan2bit on January 26, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    I can’t stop laughing at “utterly unique in the anals of commercial fiction” – because I’m 12, and also because I’d always assumed that’s where most commercial fiction comes out of.

    Reply
    • genedoucette on January 26, 2011 at 4:16 pm

      Wait, where was that!!!?

      Reply
      • dan2bit on January 26, 2011 at 9:30 pm

        “From her point of view it’s a Romance. If you’re not a Romance fan, reader or writer, small wonder you don’t think that would be interesting, or that the novel would be utterly unique in the anals of commercial fiction.”

        Reply
  5. Sue London on January 26, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    Just remember: “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.” ~ Oscar Wilde

    Reply
    • genedoucette on January 26, 2011 at 11:31 pm

      Sure, sure. But he’s dead now, ISN’T HE?

      Reply

Leave a Comment